![]() ![]() Information received in the context of the country visit to Croatia European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, Platform on mapping media freedom Council of Europe, Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists (2021), Croatian President Milanovic verbally attacked HRT journalists, no.Īn ad-hoc report by the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom concluded in 2019 that the establishment of KESMA would exacerbate the overall risks to media pluralism in Hungary (2020 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Hungary, p.Īn ad-hoc report99 of the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom concluded that ‘the establishment of KESMA via the merger of more than 470 different media outlets will exacerbate the overall risk(s)’ to media pluralism in Hungary across several key indicators analysed by the Media Pluralism Monitor, including journalists’ working conditions, horizontal and cross-media ownership concentration and the allocation of state advertising. ![]() International Press Institute (IPI), Article 19, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF), the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU) and Reporters without Borders (RSF): Conclusions of the joint international press freedom mission to Hungary (3 December 2019). The heart of Appellant’s argument on the merits is its claim that the PACE Act’s grant of equal dignity for non-ad valorem special assessments with tax liens unconstitutionally overrides its interest in earlier-recorded mortgages. Press and Media Freedom: Independent media were active and expressed a wide variety of views without restriction.Ĭontribution from the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom for the 2021 Rule of Law Report, p. Media Freedom in Chinese Hong Kong, The Transnational Lawyer 11 (1998),p. Press and Media Freedom: Independent media were active and expressed a wide variety of views. Our submission makes the case for comprehensive and principle-based EU action, which respects the delicate balance between single market objectives and the importance of national competencies to shape specific media pluralism and independence, social and cultural issues.ĭownload our position paper in response to the public consultation on the right.The implementation was conducted in 28 EU Member States, Serbia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRoM) and Turkey with the support of a grant awarded by the European Union to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute. Therefore, we welcome the Commission’s initiative and support its overall goal of securing and supporting independence and pluralism of the media in Europe. Any threat to the independence and availability of media - whether via governmental interference, intimidation of journalists, lack of transparency in for example ownership structures, commercial pressure or abusive gatekeeping power - upsets the overall state of media freedom and pluralism in Europe. In parallel, global online platforms have entered the market and significantly influence how information can be accessed and how opinions are formed. With that, freedom of expression and of the media have suffered. We share the Commission’s concerns that levels of democracy have declined in Europe over the past years. As the European Commission prepares its European Media Freedom Act, the EBU has submitted its input to the public consultation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |